[x]
Welcome to the Stink Eye Discussion Forum!
Join the Discussion! Click Here for Instant Registration.
The Stink Eye Conservative Forum; Politics, News, Republican Election Headquarters
June 16, 2024, 09:22:46 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: ***2012 South Carolina Primary**** live thread  (Read 5051 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
apples
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 37975



« Reply #30 on: January 21, 2012, 07:42:56 PM »

I don't think this actually upsets the 'left'. 
Your thoughts please?
Logged
JohnBrowdie
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8296


The Stink Eye is Watching You, Barry


« Reply #31 on: January 21, 2012, 07:46:30 PM »

it will. 
Logged

"Dumb people elect dumb people." -- Natstew
JohnBrowdie
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8296


The Stink Eye is Watching You, Barry


« Reply #32 on: January 21, 2012, 07:48:11 PM »

first of all, Mia isn't representative of "the left".  she is a fiscal conservative with libertarian/liberal leanings on social policies.


Your thoughts please?
Logged

"Dumb people elect dumb people." -- Natstew
apples
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 37975



« Reply #33 on: January 21, 2012, 07:52:49 PM »

first of all, Mia isn't representative of "the left".  she is a fiscal conservative with libertarian/liberal leanings on social policies.


I just wanted and still do her thoughts on this. Wasn't really saying she is left , didn't mean it that way. Just want thoughts from others on this. Grin   
Logged
Miss Mia
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2502



« Reply #34 on: January 21, 2012, 07:54:31 PM »

Your thoughts please?

I just don't think it does.  One win for Gingrich doesn't mean it's a done deal.  I think the "left" would rather see a long and drawn out primary fight between Mitt & Gingrich.  I think Gingrich is his own worst enemy.  Also I always thought that he would be willing to take the whole party down with him in this race.  

Let's see what happens in Florida.  

I also wanted to say that Gingrich's favorability rating is worst than Obama's. 
Logged

"I have the nerve to walk my own way, however hard, in my search for reality, rather than climb upon the rattling wagon of wishful illusions." - Zora Neale Hurston
apples
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 37975



« Reply #35 on: January 21, 2012, 08:00:56 PM »

I just don't think it does.  One win for Gingrich doesn't mean it's a done deal.  I think the "left" would rather see a long and drawn out primary fight between Mitt & Gingrich.  I think Gingrich is his own worst enemy.  Also I always thought that he would be willing to take the whole party down with him in this race.  

Let's see what happens in Florida.  

I also wanted to say that Gingrich's favorability rating is worst than Obama's. 
Wink   thanks.
Logged
JohnBrowdie
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8296


The Stink Eye is Watching You, Barry


« Reply #36 on: January 21, 2012, 08:02:20 PM »

I would point out that a "long and drawn out primary process" gave us obama, rather than hillary.

and the big fear is that as we get closer to the western caucus states, dr. dickbrain will get more delegates.

Logged

"Dumb people elect dumb people." -- Natstew
Miss Mia
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2502



« Reply #37 on: January 21, 2012, 08:05:16 PM »

I would point out that a "long and drawn out primary process" gave us obama, rather than hillary.

and the big fear is that as we get closer to the western caucus states, dr. dickbrain will get more delegates.

The comparison to 2008 would make sense if Hillary had won.  She's the one that drew it out. 
Logged

"I have the nerve to walk my own way, however hard, in my search for reality, rather than climb upon the rattling wagon of wishful illusions." - Zora Neale Hurston
JohnBrowdie
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8296


The Stink Eye is Watching You, Barry


« Reply #38 on: January 21, 2012, 08:12:19 PM »

hillary got screwed.  and probably for the first time in a decade.  she got more primary votes than president ROCK STAR.



The comparison to 2008 would make sense if Hillary had won.  She's the one that drew it out. 
Logged

"Dumb people elect dumb people." -- Natstew
natstew
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1658


« Reply #39 on: January 21, 2012, 08:15:14 PM »

 The black vote cost Hillary the candidacy. The blacks would have voted for a black rock over a white candidate.
Logged
Miss Mia
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2502



« Reply #40 on: January 21, 2012, 08:20:41 PM »

hillary got screwed.  and probably for the first time in a decade.  she got more primary votes than president ROCK STAR.

Yet she was still unable to motivate enough to get the caucus voters.  Anywho, the point wasn't to rehash the 2008 primary. 
Logged

"I have the nerve to walk my own way, however hard, in my search for reality, rather than climb upon the rattling wagon of wishful illusions." - Zora Neale Hurston
JohnBrowdie
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8296


The Stink Eye is Watching You, Barry


« Reply #41 on: January 21, 2012, 08:21:18 PM »

hillary lost due to fraud in several counties in the west

The black vote cost Hillary the candidacy. The blacks would have voted for a black rock over a white candidate.
Logged

"Dumb people elect dumb people." -- Natstew
Doc
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 497



« Reply #42 on: January 21, 2012, 09:06:37 PM »

Personally, I think the left is scared s**tless of Newt.  Although presidential debates become decidely less important in the general election, their fear is that Gingrich will simply have a Reagan moment and make Obama look like a fool.

doc
Logged
Miss Mia
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2502



« Reply #43 on: January 21, 2012, 10:06:47 PM »

I also wanted to say that Gingrich's favorability rating is worst than Obama's. 

Favorability Obama/Romney/Gingrich

Fox News, 1/12-1/14:
Obama, fav/unfav, 51%/46%, +5
Romney, fav/unfav, 45%/38%, +7
Gingrich, fav/unfav, 27%/56%, -29

CBS/NYT, 1/12-1/17:
Obama, fav/unfav, 38%/45%, -7
Romney, fav/unfav, 21%/35%, -14
Gingrich, fav/unfav, 17%/49%, -32

PPP, 1/13-1/17:
Obama, app/dis, 47%/50%, -3
Romney, fav/unfav, 35%/53%, -18
Gingrich, fav/unfav, 26%/60%, -34

Washington Examiner
Logged

"I have the nerve to walk my own way, however hard, in my search for reality, rather than climb upon the rattling wagon of wishful illusions." - Zora Neale Hurston
Doc
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 497



« Reply #44 on: January 21, 2012, 10:18:36 PM »

Favorability Obama/Romney/Gingrich

Fox News, 1/12-1/14:
Obama, fav/unfav, 51%/46%, +5
Romney, fav/unfav, 45%/38%, +7
Gingrich, fav/unfav, 27%/56%, -29

CBS/NYT, 1/12-1/17:
Obama, fav/unfav, 38%/45%, -7
Romney, fav/unfav, 21%/35%, -14
Gingrich, fav/unfav, 17%/49%, -32

PPP, 1/13-1/17:
Obama, app/dis, 47%/50%, -3
Romney, fav/unfav, 35%/53%, -18
Gingrich, fav/unfav, 26%/60%, -34

Washington Examiner

And Harry Truman had a 39/61 going into his reelection.  I certainly don't put much credibility behind fav/unfav polls.  They are daily tracking numbers, and generally are very small sample size.

Further, presidential elections are really state by state elections, therefore national samplings are of little value in the long run.

doc 
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Contact Us by Email
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!